The Interplay of “Li“ (Principle) and “Yong“ (Function) in Chinese Culture: A Dynamic Understanding of Harmony70

The concept of "体用之学" (tǐ yòng zhī xué), often translated as the "principle-function dichotomy" or "substance-function duality," is a fundamental framework in understanding Chinese culture and philosophy. It's a dynamic interplay between "体" (tǐ), meaning principle, substance, or essence, and "用" (yòng), meaning function, application, or utility. This isn't a simple duality, however; it's a deeply interconnected and mutually constitutive relationship, reflecting the holistic worldview prevalent in Chinese thought. Understanding this interplay is crucial to grasping the nuances of Chinese art, ethics, politics, and even everyday life.

The origins of this concept can be traced back to ancient Chinese classics, though its explicit articulation evolved over time. While not explicitly formulated in the same way as later interpretations, the seeds of "tǐ yòng" are evident in the *I Ching* (Book of Changes), where the interplay of yin and yang represents a prototypical example of principle and function. Yin and yang are fundamental principles (tǐ), but their interaction produces the dynamism and change observed in the world (yòng). Similarly, Confucianism emphasizes the importance of both ritual (li 禮) and its practical application (yong 用) in maintaining social order and harmony. Li, the ritual system, represents the underlying principle (tǐ) that guides behavior, while its actual performance in social interactions constitutes its function (yòng).

Neo-Confucianism, particularly during the Song and Ming dynasties, further developed and systematized the concept of "tǐ yòng." Scholars like Zhu Xi (朱熹) elaborated on the relationship between principle and function, arguing that principle is the foundation upon which function is built. Function cannot exist without principle, yet principle is meaningless without its manifestation in function. They used the analogy of a tree: the tree's inherent nature (tǐ) determines its potential for growth and fruit-bearing, while the actual growth and fruiting are its function (yòng). This relationship is not static; the function, through its performance, can also refine and deepen the understanding of the underlying principle.

The "tǐ yòng" framework offers a powerful lens through which to analyze various aspects of Chinese culture. In Chinese art, for instance, the principle (tǐ) might be the underlying aesthetic ideal, such as harmony, balance, or naturalness, while the function (yòng) is the artist's skillful execution and the artwork's ability to evoke emotion and communicate meaning. A calligraphy masterpiece, for example, embodies the principle of balanced brushstrokes and ink flow (tǐ), while its function (yòng) lies in its aesthetic appeal and its capacity to convey the calligrapher's personal expression and spiritual state.

In Chinese medicine, the principle (tǐ) could be understood as the body's inherent ability to heal and maintain balance, guided by the principles of Qi (氣) and the five elements. The function (yòng) then becomes the application of various therapies, such as acupuncture, herbal medicine, and dietary adjustments, to restore balance and promote healing. The underlying principle guides the treatment, while the treatment itself serves as the practical application.

The political philosophy of China also reflects the "tǐ yòng" framework. The Mandate of Heaven (天命), the underlying principle (tǐ) that legitimizes governance, finds its expression (yòng) in the ruler's just and effective rule. A ruler's actions and policies are judged not only on their immediate effects but also on their conformity to the overarching principle of just governance. The failure to fulfill the function (yòng) could be interpreted as a loss of the Mandate of Heaven, leading to social unrest and regime change.

However, the relationship between "tǐ" and "yòng" is not without its complexities and debates. Some scholars have argued that overemphasis on either principle or function can lead to imbalances. An overemphasis on principle without adequate attention to practical application can lead to stagnation and idealism detached from reality. Conversely, prioritizing function without a firm grasp of underlying principles can result in superficiality and a lack of long-term vision.

The ideal, according to most interpretations, is a dynamic interplay, a constant feedback loop between principle and function. The function informs and refines the understanding of the principle, while the principle guides and shapes the function. This continuous interaction is crucial for achieving harmony and balance, a central value in Chinese culture. This dynamic relationship isn't about separating the two but rather understanding their inseparable interconnectedness, a holistic perspective that moves beyond simplistic dualism.

In conclusion, the "tǐ yòng" framework provides a valuable lens for understanding the complexities of Chinese culture. It highlights the importance of integrating abstract principles with practical application, emphasizing the dynamic interplay between the two rather than a rigid separation. This holistic perspective underscores the pursuit of harmony and balance, a central theme that permeates various aspects of Chinese thought and practice, shaping its unique cultural identity.

2025-04-16

Previous：China Culture Forum Registration: Dates, Details, and Cultural Insights

Next：My Unfolding Journey: Discovering the Rich Tapestry of Chinese Culture