Tracing the Origins of “Chinese Cultural Genes“: A Multifaceted Exploration204

The concept of "Chinese cultural genes" (中国文化基因, Zhōngguó wénhuà jīyīn) doesn't have a single, readily identifiable originator. Instead, it's a phrase that emerged and evolved over time, reflecting a complex interplay of scholarly thought, political discourse, and popular understanding within China. Pinpointing a single individual as the "proposer" is therefore an oversimplification, akin to asking who invented "democracy" – a concept with roots spanning centuries and multiple contributors. However, we can trace its development through key figures and intellectual currents.

The underlying idea – that certain core values, beliefs, and practices have persisted throughout Chinese history and shaped its unique identity – predates the specific phrase itself. Confucianism, for instance, with its emphasis on filial piety, social harmony, and hierarchical order, has profoundly influenced Chinese culture for millennia. The concept of a continuous and distinctive Chinese civilization, often linked to a narrative of unbroken cultural lineage, is a theme that resonates throughout Chinese historiography, particularly during periods of national rejuvenation or foreign interaction. Thinkers like Gu Jiegang (顧頡剛), a pioneer of modern Chinese historical scholarship, critically examined this narrative, questioning its monolithic nature and highlighting the dynamism and diversity within Chinese history. Yet, even his critiques implicitly acknowledged the existence of enduring cultural elements.

The rise of the People's Republic of China (PRC) witnessed a renewed focus on defining and promoting a national identity. Mao Zedong and his successors emphasized the importance of "patriotic education," often linking it to specific historical narratives and cultural symbols. While not explicitly using the term "cultural genes," their emphasis on tradition and national unity laid the groundwork for the later conceptualization of this idea. This period saw a strong emphasis on particular aspects of Chinese culture, often presented in a simplified and sometimes idealized manner, to foster national cohesion and a sense of collective identity.

The post-Mao era saw a burgeoning interest in cultural studies, both within and outside of China. Scholars began to explore the complexities of Chinese culture with greater nuance and critical perspective. The term "cultural genes" itself, while not a rigid academic concept, gained traction in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. It was used in various contexts, from academic discussions of cultural transmission to popular media commentaries on national identity. This period showed a more diverse and nuanced understanding of “cultural genes,” acknowledging internal conflicts and variations. The concept wasn’t always consistently defined, often operating as a shorthand for a complex interplay of factors.

Several prominent intellectuals and public figures contributed to the popularization of the term, though rarely claiming sole authorship. Many scholars, particularly those engaged in cultural studies and anthropology, explored the transmission and evolution of Chinese cultural traits. They often used metaphors akin to "genes" to highlight the enduring nature of certain cultural elements. These scholars, however, generally avoided simplistic interpretations, acknowledging the dynamic and contested nature of cultural inheritance. Their work provided the intellectual context for the wider use of the phrase, enriching the discourse around it.

The rise of globalization and increased interaction with other cultures further stimulated discussions about Chinese cultural identity. The need to understand and articulate what makes Chinese culture unique gained renewed urgency. This context provided fertile ground for the concept of "cultural genes" to flourish. The term resonated with a desire to identify and safeguard essential aspects of Chinese culture in the face of global influences.

It's important to note that the concept of "cultural genes" has been met with both enthusiasm and critique. Some scholars find it a useful metaphor for understanding the persistence of certain cultural patterns, while others criticize it for oversimplifying the complexities of cultural evolution and potentially reinforcing essentialist views of Chinese identity. The debate highlights the inherent challenges in defining and categorizing culture, especially within a nation as diverse and historically complex as China.

In conclusion, attributing the concept of "Chinese cultural genes" to a single individual is misleading. It's a phrase that evolved organically, shaped by centuries of intellectual discourse, political ideologies, and ongoing debates about national identity. While specific individuals contributed to the popularization of the term and the underlying ideas, its emergence reflects a collective effort, a confluence of historical trends and intellectual currents within China. The concept itself remains a topic of ongoing discussion and critical analysis, reflecting the enduring complexity and dynamism of Chinese culture itself.

2025-04-09

Previous：Founding Fathers of New China‘s Culture: A Multifaceted Legacy

Next：A Deep Dive into Chinese Culture: Reflections on “A General Treatise on Chinese Culture“